To do: Adam is supposed to email Tiffany with the ideas that ICP thought of for parallel systems innovations and see what WV thinks of them.
Summary of the meeting today to transition from iteration 1 to iteration 2. We reviewed the first iteration learnings. Second, we did 1 round of ideation on the slum wastecart. Finally, we did 1 round of ideation on parallel systems innovations. Ideas generated are listed under their session in the document. Later I hope to make a brainstorming document that graphically captures the idea sketches.
Some design site picked up on a "suburb" of garbage in Cairo.
As part of ICP's internal project documentation, I hosted a meeting to map out the system, the stakeholders, and the challenges and lessons learned so far.
Besides sound documentation, and many lessons learned, 2 things came out that are immediately relevant:
1. Adam should post to the blog gradually, as he goes, not 10 blogs at a time. So this is the first of gradual others.
2. ICP will have a brainstorm for solutions to ensure that when a final cart is designed, it will be maintained efficiently.
This also fits nicely into my current process of preparing for ICP to carry forward the next iterations of wastecart designs
Thanks to Brooke for taking great notes which you can see by clicking below
Wastecart Review Meeting Notes
We made a physical timeline of the project by categorizing events according to design process.
Again, this is all thanks to Brooke's work setting up templates for ICP's project documentation, but special thanks for digitizing our stakeholder map we drew. This is how I experienced it, anyways.
The system above captures 2 different approaches ICP can follow. 1 is through local community-based partners (like SEWA Union or Jan Sewa). The second is through an organization like IGS or WV that do not directly coordinate waste collectors.
Here is a picture of a process for bringing in a cart and stakeholders needed to be involved to maintain it.
Finally, here are 3 excell sheets packaged into one document:
1) Challenges and Lessons Learned
2) Process only
3) Process with events and challenges and lessons learned.