11 May 2012

Stair Stack Concept Goes for A T(r)ip

I have been trying to come up with innovative ways to design a cart for the most narrow of slum lanes, but that can still have more capacity. 

A few days ago, we tested out one concept, the Stair Stack. This design uses 6 x 30 liter buckets and makes the width only the size of 1 bucket but adds another row of buckets on 1 side. Because of obvious stability concerns, I wanted to not only try it out but take it to its full limit, i.e. to see how much load and what kind of ground conditions would cause it to flip.

Good news is it was strong enough to carry brooke and sanam's weight fine. Also, it works great on really smooth ground. Also, maneuvarability with the 3 wheels was liked, even though it performed less well with weight on sand and really bumpy ground.

Then we loaded it with ~140 kgs of sand distributed slightly more to the top level buckets. This was to simulate what could happen if it was loaded incorrectly. If it was filled with waste the load would be much closer to ~100 kgs max total, but we wanted to test its limits.

The pics included should tell the story in picture form.

(download)

30 Apr 2012

Green Buckets Finally Acquired for Wastecart

After chasing down municipal people, we finally acquired (on loan) 6 green 40L buckets from the Ahmedabad Municipal Coorperation. They claim they each cost 600 Rs, but we will confirm that with the manufacturer who is local according to Zaid. These buckets are good for dense organics since they are small, and also they stack, unlike almost all locally available buckets.

(download)

27 Apr 2012

Skype meeting with Waste Ventures – Parag & Tiffany

  • Waste Ventures is looking to roll-out their waste management project in Mhow in June and another project in another city a bit after.
  • They are interested in seeing if the 2nd iteration wastecart will be something that they can take and make for use in these projects.
  • I told them that I am hoping to have a CAD design by mid-May that they can take forward. The concern is that this will not be tested. Nor fabricated. It will take someone to lead the fabrication of a couple on site, the testing, evaluation, redesign, and then fabricate again. It should be a local and someone who can operate solidworks and can design critically.
  • WV asked if I knew someone who could carry it forward. I said that ICP is in a transition stage, so maybe post-July it will be in a stage to bring in people to work on this design, but right now ICP does not seem to have anyone. WV is considering bringing on a fellow or getting design help for this stage.
  • I also informed them that ICP is likely carrying forward the wastecart project for the slum context in Ahmedabad. Together we had laid out a 3 iteration process that would see a wastecart going into dissemination around June 2013.
  • As for financials, it seems that everything is slowly figuring itself out.
  • WV asked how they could be helpful, and I mentioned that I could use more clarity on the system that the cart would be rolled out with. This will help me with the cart, and also with the design of the process recommendations by which to introduce the cart.

To do: Adam is supposed to email Tiffany with the ideas that ICP thought of for parallel systems innovations and see what WV thinks of them.

26 Apr 2012

Skype meeting with Noel from Catapult

Click here to download:
Noel_skype_1.pdf (52 KB)
(download)

Thanks, Noel

26 Apr 2012

Wastecart Group Brainstorming Meeting Notes

Click here to download:
Review_Brainstorm_Meeting_Summary.pdf (204 KB)
(download)

Summary of the meeting today to transition from iteration 1 to iteration 2. We reviewed the first iteration learnings. Second, we did 1 round of ideation on the slum wastecart. Finally, we did 1 round of ideation on parallel systems innovations. Ideas generated are listed under their session in the document. Later I hope to make a brainstorming document that graphically captures the idea sketches.

Thanks Parag, Sanam, and Brooke for taking the time to participate. I don't plan to host any further ICP group brainstorms on the wastecart itself, so if you have any ideas talk to me in person. We will be doing conceptual designs and rapid prototyping over te next week.
26 Apr 2012

Wastecart Review and Ideation Meeting Agenda

Click here to download:
Review_Brainstorm_Meeting_Agenda.pdf (76 KB)
(download)
26 Apr 2012

Wastecart Trial Summaries

I summarized the two rapid wastecart trials, complete with images and specs of the various configurations of the cart that were tested late December 2011 and January 2012.

Since I was the only one doing the trials, the blog posts were too detailed to provide overall perspective, and I left so abruptly after completing the trials I hope that this can help others who are interested to better understand what trials were conducted and what the learnings were.

Click here to download:
Indore_Bungalow_Trial1_Summary.pdf (478 KB)
(download)

Click here to download:
Ahmedabad_Slum_Trial1_Summary.pdf (455 KB)
(download)

25 Apr 2012

Garbage "Cities"

Some design site picked up on a "suburb" of garbage in Cairo. 

Remove the multi-story structures and there is a similar feeling of life swimming in garbage to informal Indian ragpicker areas - like the one visited in Delhi a few weekends ago. 

(download)

21 Apr 2012

Vimo Sewa and MIT-Pune Ragpicker Design Project

Parag and I went to check out the ragpicker livelihood products being designed by MIT-Pune Design students with Vimo Sewa. A ragpicker is not a doorstep wastecollector, but refers to the people who scavenge for resellables in the trash, and then take it to scrap shops. Some take it home for segregation since they can get a higher rate. Some hire rickshaws to then transport sacks of waste stored at their home, to the scrapdealer.

We met Kanksha who showed us the goods in their top floor storage room. Apparently the group came to Ahmedabad and did a needs assessment. They identified needs for a collection device, a device for collecting paper without bending down, and a handrake to minimize hand contact with the rake. 

Parag is discussing with them, and MIT-Pune to see what role ICP can play in this.

Cart
Design
Cart is made of bamboo with steel pipe connections that are screwed into the bamboo. The connections are not strong (could be due to missing screw, or bad quality) and this leaves the cart frame wobbly.
The frame is covered in woven fabric, similar to lawn chairs, with a heavy cotton-looking cloth covering it.
The wheel assembly was identical to the Swaach design made by MIT-Pune for waste collection. It is an efficient and light wheel assembly utilizing motorcycle rims, tires, a specially-made rim with 2 covered bearings on each wheel. The axle is a hollow tube. This assembly can carry much more weight than a ragpicker would carry and would be around 5000Rs to produce.

Trials
They tested the cart in a couple places over a 1 day period.
The response according to Kanksha was:
  • Cart was too big. It was not able to maneuver where it needed to go
  • The cloth became soggy from water and then destroyed dry wastes.
  • Storage of the cart was not easy.

Accessories: Handrake and Rod
Design
Here they did a typical give them a bunch of slightly different versions of each accessory, and see which ones work best. For rods, they were trying different handles, and different pick-up methods. They tried rebar with a sharpened end as well as one that had a spring action plastic extension for sticking through the paper. The handrakes had different handles and different types of teeth. They also had a couple they had welded specially for the purpose.

Trials
They tested the different accesories with 10 different ragpickers over 11 days. 
Two handrakes were liked, both with longer teeth and comfortable handles.
The rod was not liked in general. People were afraid of taking these things with them for fear of being stolen.
Also they had no where to keep these accessories while on the streets.

(download)

18 Apr 2012

Detailed Internal Meta-Review of 1st Iteration

As part of ICP's internal project documentation, I hosted a meeting to map out the system, the stakeholders, and the challenges and lessons learned so far.

Besides sound documentation, and many lessons learned, 2 things came out that are immediately relevant:

1. Adam should post to the blog gradually, as he goes, not 10 blogs at a time. So this is the first of gradual others.

2. ICP will have a brainstorm for solutions to ensure that when a final cart is designed, it will be maintained efficiently.

This also fits nicely into my current process of preparing for ICP to carry forward the next iterations of wastecart designs

Thanks to Brooke for taking great notes which you can see by clicking below

Wastecart Review Meeting Notes

We made a physical timeline of the project by categorizing events according to design process.

(download)

Again, this is all thanks to Brooke's work setting up templates for ICP's project documentation, but special thanks for digitizing our stakeholder map we drew. This is how I experienced it, anyways.

Stakeholdermap

The system above captures 2 different approaches ICP can follow. 1 is through local community-based partners (like SEWA Union or Jan Sewa). The second is through an organization like IGS or WV that do not directly coordinate waste collectors.

Here is a picture of a process for bringing in a cart and stakeholders needed to be involved to maintain it.

Ideal_stakeholdermap

Finally, here are 3 excell sheets packaged into one document:

1) Challenges and Lessons Learned

2) Process only

3) Process with events and challenges and lessons learned.

Click here to download:
Wastecart_Process_Review_Compiled.xlsx (13 KB)
(download)

Contributors

Linus Kendall paraggupta Tiffany Talsma Tiffany Talsma atalsma paragmody

Archive